2019: Reading Challenge

I’ve been neglecting this blog for far too long in part because I haven’t been reviewing much of the books I read last year, which was a big mistake because 2018 was a great reading year. A terrible year otherwise, but a great year for genre fiction for me. Unfortunately, by not reviewing those books, I’ve forgotten about over half of them. So this year I’m going to try to do better and be more organized.

Mainly, I’m gonna try something new this year to see if I can 1) review every book I read (not just the really good ones or the really bad ones; everything in between as well) and 2) get more books off my short list, with particular focus on books I own.

Also gonna cut down on rereads and new releases, unless they’re part of a series I’m currently reading.

The “challenge” for this year is 48 books reviewed, not read–I usually read about that much in half a year.

So I have a list of 48 books planned for the year with 4 alternates waiting in the wing in case I get through the whole list earlier than planned, and the list looks something like this:

Ninefox Gambit by Yoon Ha Lee (review)
Two Serpents Rise by Max Gladstone (review)
The Gospel of Loki by Joanne Harris (review)
Raising Stony Mayhall by Daryl Gregory (review)
Sorcerer to the Crown by Zen Cho (review)

– Children of Time by Adrian Tchaikovsky
– Where Oblivion Lives by Teresa Frohock
– A Darker Shade of Magic by V. E. Schwab
– Athyra & Orca by Steven Brust (technically 2 books but 1 omnibus)
– The Minority Council by Kate Griffin

– A Dangerous Collaboration by Deanna Raybourn
– Wild Country by Anne Bishop
– Death of the Necromancer by Martha Wells
– The Weavers of Saramyr by Chris Wooding

– The Onion Girl by Charles de Lint
– Lord of the Fading Lands by C. L. Wilson
– Cold-Forged Flame by Marie Brennan (novella)
– Valor’s Choice by Tanya Huff

– The October Man by Ben Aaronovitch (novella)
– Death by Dumping by Vivien Chen
– A Symphony of Echoes by Jodi Taylor
– Hope Never Dies by Andrew Shaffer

– A Lady’s Guide to Etiquette and Murder by Dianne Freeman
– Agent of Change by Sharon Lee
– Heartstone by Elle Katharine White
– The Lotus Palace by Jeannie Lin

– Changeless by Gail Carriger
– Sky Raiders by Michelle Diener
– The Cold Between by Elizabeth Bonesteel
– Song for the Basilisk by Patricia Mckillip

– Spirit Gate by Kate Elliott
– The Iron Khan by Liz Williams
– God Stalk by P. C. Hodgell
– Witch’s Blood by Ginn Hale

– Silent in the Grave by Deanna Raybourn
– To Say Nothing of the Dog by Connie Willis
– Borne by Jeff Vandermeer
– Petty Magic by Camille Deangelis

– Johannes Cabal the Necromancer by Jonathan L. Howard
– Strange Practice by Vivian Shaw
– The Black Wolves of Boston by Wen Spencer
– Certain Dark Things by Silvia Moreno-Garcia

– A Dirty Job by Christopher Moore
– Fledgling by Octavia Butler
– City of Stairs by Robert Jackson Bennett
– Miserere: An Autumn Tale by Teresa Frohock

– The Wizard Hunters by Martha Wells
– The Year of Our War by Steph Swainston
– Melusine by Sarah Monette
– The Lions of Al-Rassan by Guy Gavriel Kay

*First Fifteen Lives of Harry August by Claire North
*The Wolf of Winter by Paula Volsky
*Witchmark by C. L. Polk
*[…something…] by Jennifer Fallon


Did Not Finish, Vol. 2

The urban fantasy edition. My favorite genre, which is probably why I take so many chances and try so many books, even ones that I doubt I would like in the off chance that it would be a hit. It’s usually not, and that’s why I DNF so many in this genre. When it’s good, it’s really good, but when it’s not, it’s… please see below.

A Hunger Like No Other (Immortals After Dark #2)
by Kresley Cole
This is the second book in the Immortals After Dark series and the only time I will ever read anything by Kresley Cole. Not only is this bad, but it’s bad in a “how did this get published???” kind of way.

Dark Lover (Black Dagger Brotherhood #1)
by J. R. Ward
This is the first book in the popular Black Dagger Brotherhood series and most likely the only book I’ll ever try by J.R. Ward. Not any better than Kresley Cole, but sort of more interesting? Maybe. Sort of.

Hexed (Iron Druid Chronicles #2)
by Kevin Hearne
Nothing wrong with this book or series; the writing is just not for me–too much “jaded” snark crammed in. The first book was meh with a dash of try-hard, as in it tried too hard to appear “cool” or “cooler” than its urban fantasy counterparts. Case in point? The main character is a 2,000-something years old wizard, yet speaks and thinks as though he’s a hipster millennial, but he’s neither a believable hipster or a believable millennial. He reads like what he is–a young character written by an author who mirrors his characters after what he thinks is “cool.” Being from hipster central myself, I just don’t find that part of the characterization believable, so that’s a deal-breaker.

A Local Habitation (October Daye #2)
by Seanan McGuire
After finishing and not liking the first book, I kept this series on my radar because so many friends kept recommending and saying it gets better, but what little I read of the sample chapter failed to capture my interest. Even the title bores me.

Blood Bound (Mercy Thompson #2)
by Patricia Briggs
After finishing the first book and was on the fence about it, I gave the second one a try because the world building was pretty good tbh and I didn’t wanna miss out on a series that could very well turn out to be good. First books in urban fantasies are dicey, and long series don’t really take shape until the second or third book (or fourth or fifth). What stopped me from continuing this series was the main character. Simply put, Mercy bores me and I have no interest in following her around for twenty more books.

Two Serpents Rise (Craft Sequence #2)
by Max Gladstone
While I liked the first book just fine and enjoy Max Gladstone’s writing in general (A Kiss with Teeth, The Angelus Guns), I had a hard time getting into this one because the main character was a bit boring and there was too much going on at the beginning. Plus, I think at the time I was impatient for a story that I could sink my teeth into without having to work so hard or wade through so much text to get to the good stuff. Temporary DNF for now with promises to return soon… ish.

***Finished!*** (review)

Firefight (Reckoners #2)
by Brandon Sanderson
Too young for me, just like the first book, but this time I couldn’t bring myself to care enough about the characters to keep reading past the sample chapter. I think this was around the time I was fed up with Brandon Sanderson in general, and reading any more of his particular, repetitive style of fantasy was just too much.

Fool Moon (Dresden Files #2)
by Jim Butcher
This one bored me right out of the gate because… well, Harry Dresden. I pushed through the first book to prove a point and put an end to doubts. Turned out I was right: this series is not for me. But again, friends kept on recommending it, saying it would get better, so I gave the second one a try and it’s further proof that this series is not for me.

Days of Blood & Starlight (Daughter of Smoke & Bone #2)
by Laini Taylor
Another one that’s too young for me. The first book had all the irksome quirks of young adult, but the world building was good, so I stuck with it to the end. The second book was more of the same, but I was looking for something with more depth and less YA. I think all the “beautiful” descriptions of all the pretty things just got on my nerves. Why the obsession with beautiful things? What’s wrong with plain fugly things? They need love too… as all things need love…

Cast In Courtlight (Chronicles of Elantra #2)
by Michelle Sagara
I read the first book with Beth as a buddy read. She liked it a lot more than I did (her thoughtful and concise review here). I expected to like it, because 1) long series, 2) the description was interesting and 3) several Goodreads friends gave it high ratings, but I found the writing too messy and meandering. Plus I’m not a fan of the stream of consciousness style. Also, the main character, who is a detective, is bad at her job and entirely unbelievable. While I believe she is bad at her job, I don’t believe her as a detective, but the thing is, this whole series revolves around her being a detective and it’s told from her first-person POV… which really sucks.

Dead Witch Walking (The Hollows #1)
by Kim Harrison
It’s been a long time since I’ve read a book and wondered “have I read this before?” I’m usually pretty good at recalling beginnings, especially beginnings of books I end up abandoning, but with this book, there was a moment in which I couldn’t be sure whether or not I had read it or abandoned it because the writing style was not only familiar, but it’s so familiar that I was sure I’d read this book before. I hadn’t though. It was PNR deja vu. Rachel Morgan is full of sass and snark and has very little substance, and her antics get old very quickly, like around page 10. I think I pushed myself to the 30% mark before call it quits due to recurring boredom.

Pacific Fire (Daniel Blackland #2)
by Greg Van Eekhout
I tried reading this one right after the first one, hoping it would get me more into the series. Didn’t work. Only made me more annoyed with the main characters which were too young and teenager-y for my liking. The world building is still fantastic though. I just couldn’t get into the characters or gave a damn about their life-or-death situations or cared about how they’ll save the world. It really is too bad because I really liked the setting, world building, and magic.

Sixty-One Nails (Courts of the Feyre #1)
by Mike Shevdon
Couldn’t get into this one. Don’t know why. There was something about the writing in the first 10% that didn’t capture my interest, and so reading on felt more like a chore than an escape. Didn’t help that the whole series is about the fae and their courtly politics. Kudos for the middle-aged main character though… perhaps I will give this one another go.

London Falling (Shadow Police #1)
by Paul Cornell
I wanted to like this book. Other than Two Serpents Rise, this is the only other book on this list that I regret not finishing. It’s got all the makings of a nice, chewy cop drama with some paranormal thrown in. Also, it’s set in London. But the book opened with too much going on. The writing moved too quickly from scene to scene and very little info is given about what’s going on and the characters involved. I couldn’t follow what was being said, let alone catch all the subtle implications. So I got bored not being able to follow the story or, rather, not being in on the take. Stopped at around 30% with plans to return, but I don’t know at the point. Maybe I’ll audiobook it.

Did Not Finish, Vol. 1

So after posting a string of 4- or 5-star rated books on here and my Goodreads, I feel a responsibility to be honest. It’s not normal for me to like everything I read; I’ve just gotten really good at picking books over the years, and I can kind of sense whether or not I would like a book prior to reading. But I still abandon books, not as often as before, but it still happens. Sometimes I abandon books based on what little I read of the sample chapters. It doesn’t take much for me to write off a book and not look back, although sometimes I put it aside and wait a couple of years before trying it again, but that’s rare.

Here are some of my DNFs over the years, in no particular order.

Invader by C.J. Cherryh, second book in the Foreigner series
Stopped at around 30%
I read the first book not too long ago and thought it was okay, if a bit tedious and boring, but since I like long series and politics in space, I decided to push on with the second book. People kept saying the series gets better later on. So yeah, why not? Turns out, they’re wrong. j/k. They’re only sort of wrong. The writing is still tedious and boring, but less so than the first book, and a lot of plot elements set up in the first book are brewing with the promise of real action, most likely to be continued in the third book. So I’m mildly interested.
Verdict: Will reread some other time when I’m older and hopefully more patient

Before the Fall by Noah Hawley
DNF at sample chapter
You might remember this one as that popular book about a mysterious plane crash and its mysterious survivors being mysteriously connected somehow. Like Lost (the TV show), but with fewer interesting characters. The premise intrigued me, but the writing failed to capture my interest. Plus, it kind of comes off as an excuse for the author to vent his personal and political “feelings” for the “state of the world.” I didn’t read far enough to get a sense where he falls on the spectrum nor did I care. Politics in space? EXCITING. Politics here on earth? HARD PASS.
Verdict: Nah

Wildfire by Ilona Andrews, the third and last book in the Hidden Legacy series
DNF at page 2
While I like the Andrews’ writing for the most part, I have no love for this series. Kate Daniels will always be a favorite of mine. This series, however, will always be on my to-be-burned list. The first book is a billionaire romance disguised as comic-book urban fantasy and it was very nearly awful; the second book wasn’t as bad, but that’s in no way a compliment. The third book showed no improvement, but not a surprise. I only sampled the sample chapter to see if it was worth finishing the series–it’s not.
Verdict: Nope

Throne of Glass by Sarah J. Maas, first in series and the last I’ll ever read of it
DNF at sample chapter
I have read and DNF’d this author once before. I just completely forgot about it. The prototype for these books is basically why I have an I am too old for this shelf. What we have here is a young, “sassy,” “snarky,” “fiesty,” “strong,” “smart,” heroine with some athletic prowess and a talent for “assassination.” She somehow gets in trouble and is offered a chance to avoid a death sentence. Either be executed or be used by the kingdom for “assassination” purposes. She chooses life, obviously. Then she becomes an “assassin” who then falls for a boring pampered prince (aka her royal equivalent), and then she spends the rest of the series frolicking in the woods in between “assassinations.” Right? IDK. I’ve never been able to finish these books.
Verdict: Haha, of course not

The Tropic of Serpents by Marie Brennan, second Memoir of Lady Trent
Not a DNF
This is a very good series, one that I have every intention of returning to soon, just have to find the time and mood for it. The first book was excellent (it’s a historical scientific study of dragons! In the wild!) and Lady Trent is a character I’m invested in, but I didn’t like how things ended for her or her husband, so I’m setting this book aside for now but not indefinitely.
Verdict: Will read when the mood strikes

Waking Gods by Sylvain Neuvel, second in the Themis Files
DNF at sample chapter
There’s nothing wrong with this book except for the way in which it’s written. If you like epistolary and sci-fi, chances are you would enjoy these books more than I did. I kind of liked the first one actually and was interested in continuing the series, but I have no love for the epistolary style. Just thinking about it makes me set things on fire not want to read any further. It’s not the book, it’s me. Well, maybe it’s the book too, but it’s mostly me this time.
Verdict: Not for me

Changeless by Gail Carriger, second in the Parasol Protectorate series
Not a DNF
Like the Lady Trent series, I plan on returning to Alexa Tarabotti’s world some time in the near future because I had fun with the first book, but so far, I haven’t been in the mood for Victorian steampunk romance. And also, I’ve heard that, as much as Gail Carriger makes fun of and calls out Victorian norms and mores, she doesn’t quite do the same for England’s role in colonizing over half the world. So for now, and in the foreseeable future, I’m in no mood for favorable portrayals of colonialism in fiction, regardless of genre.
Verdict: Will read when the mood strikes

Black Powder War by Naomi Novik, the third in the Temeraire series
Not a DNF
This is another series that has a similar colonial problem. Told from the point of view of a high-ranking British officer, the writing paints a favorable picture of the British Empire. Believable and realistic because of the character telling the story, but not exactly a perspective I’m eager to return to or one that can keep me reading well into book #9. I don’t know what the series is like in later books; perhaps Captain Laurence grows and gains insight and takes an uncharacteristically un-British turn in his story. That’s what I’m hoping for anyway, and we do see a little bit of his character growth at the end of the second book. I’m hoping to see more of that as he and Temeraire continue their journey from China back to England.
Verdict: Will read when the mood strikes

Sword-Dancer by Jennifer Roberson, first in the Tiger and Del series
Stopped at chapter 5
If written from Del’s point of view, I would have been done with this book years ago and probably would have finished the series by now. But no, in between Del’s chapters, you get Tiger’s chapters and he is an irritating he-man sort of character who’s also kind of an ass, and I have no patience for that kind of nonsense, not in fiction or irl. Fortunately though, I hear he and the series get better in later books, which is good to hear and the reason I’m still trying to finish this book.
Verdict: Will finish… some day…

***Finished!*** (short note)

Stardust and Neverwhere by Neil Gaiman
DNF at sample chapters
No matter how hard I try, I can’t seem to get into Neil Gaiman’s writing as much as the rest of the world. So I’ve concluded it’s not from a lack of trying on my part since I have read 4 of his books (American Gods, The Graveyard Book, The Ocean at the End of the Lane, Good Omens). I just don’t like Gaiman’s writing as much as everyone else. To be completely honest, I’m not entirely sure what so many see in his books. I mean, they’re fine books. But that’s just it. They’re fine books. Yet so many people rave about them as though they’ve never read good contemporary fantasy. Maybe that’s just it. Many of them don’t read enough fantasy and Gaiman’s are the only genre books they read, which goes to explain all the ravings.
Verdict: Maybe some day, if either book is chosen for a book club

Foreigner (Foreigner #1) by C.J. Cherryh


Rating: ★ ★ ★ ☆ ☆
Date Read: April 10 to May 5, 2017

This book ends when the story is just about to get interesting. And that’s the most effective way to lose an audience.

Up until the ending, it’s a real repetitive uphill slog, and I say that as someone who liked it more than most people. Reading it was a labor-intensive task that I never thought would end and I would never have been able to get to the end without the help of the audio–again, speaking as someone who liked the story. The prose and plotting could use a lot of editing, and the inner monologues could use some deleting. But the alien world and cultures were interesting, and they seemed to have the potential to become even more interesting. For that alone, I would pick up the second book.

Back to the ending and what I think most people don’t know about this book: it’s not an ending, but it’s not quite a cliffhanger either, and thus the reason behind so many frustrated reviews. While it’s not an ending, it does leaving you in the middle of a scene that could potentially be interesting if you were already invested in the story and characters. But if you weren’t, it wouldn’t be a huge loss to not know how it all ends or whether or not Bren Cameron survives and is able to navigate the delicate relations between humans and atevi.

I wouldn’t say I’m invested, but I do want to know what happens next–alien worlds and political intrigue are an interesting combination. Maybe not right away though because a break is in order after that slog, but as soon as the audio for the second book is available, I’m on it.

Full review when I get through the first the books or a complete story in the case of this series.

* *
* * *
* * * spoilers below * * *

Continue reading

Ten Bookish Questions

Stealing this meme from a bunch of people because I really like the questions–they’re just too hard to resist. Feel free to do the same and let me know. I love reading these.

1. What book is on your nightstand now?
Death by Black Hole by Neil deGrasse Tyson
– Space is big and scary. NdT makes it less so. He makes me think about all the possibilities and how they really are possible.

A Short History of Nearly Everything by Bill Bryson
– Permanent nightstand staple. I will reread this book until it’s no longer fun*.

Silver on the Road by Laura Anne Gilman
– I can’t seem to finish this book. Don’t know why. It’s not even a difficult book. It’s just really slow, like unbelievably so.

Kushiel’s Dart by Jacqueline Carey
– Yet this 800+ page hardcover doorstop that heavily features a host of uncomfortable things is… a breeze. Go figure.

* which is never

2. What was the last truly great book that you read?
Ah… too many to choose from, so I’ll just stick to this year. So far the short list looks like this:
The Fifth Season by N. K. Jemisin
Way Station by Clifford Simak
The Library at Mount Char by Scott Hawkins
The Long Way to a Small, Angry Planet by Becky Chambers
but I’m sure there’ll be more. I’m getting pretty good at choosing stellar reads. The trick is to really, really know what you like and choose according to your current mood.

3. If you could meet any writer – dead or alive – who would it be? And what would you want to know?
Octavia Butler. Everything. I would want to know everything about her, starting with where she got her ideas. There isn’t much written about her, and she rarely gave interviews. So much of her life and career is still a mystery, and now we’ll never know.

4. What books might we be surprised to find on your shelves?
5 different editions of Pride & Prejudice. I don’t think it’s that surprising to people who know me, but casual friends and acquaintances are always taken aback. It’s probably because they’ve only seen me read genre.

5. How do you organize your personal library?
It used to be by favorite books, but now it’s by priority. Must-reads get quality shelf space–front and center, so that I can actually see them–while everything else gets whatever space I can squeeze them into.

6. What book have you always meant to read and haven’t gotten around to yet? Anything you feel embarrassed never to have read?
– The rest of Octavia Butler’s backlist: Kindred, Fledgling, the Patternmaster series, the Earthseed duology, her short story collections. It’s only a matter of time before I get to them all. For now, I’m saving them for when I’m emotionally ready because there’s so much packed into her writing that I can’t just read her books, then move onto to other things. I absorb them and they stay with me forever, and anything I read after pales in comparison.

– I’m kind of embarrassed I haven’t read more China Mieville than just Un Lun Dun or more Guy Gavriel Kay than just Tigana. Will have to try harder this year since I own most of their backlists.

7. Disappointing, overrated, just not good: what book did you feel you were supposed to like but didnt? Do you remember the last book you put down without finishing?
– It’s a tie between The Night Circus by Erin Morgenstern and A Discovery of Witches by Deborah Harkness. Both seemed tailored to my taste at first glance, yet neither turned out the way I’d hoped.

– Does reading a sample chapter and deciding not to buy count as not finishing a book? Because I do that a lot, and I don’t really remember the last book I sampled and passed on. It was probably Before the Fall by Noah Hawley.

8. What kinds of stories are you drawn to? Any you stay clear of?
– Things I’m drawn to always have elements of sci-fi and/or fantasy, and really, that’s all it takes to get my attention. Another thing I’m drawn to, when I’m in the mood, is a gripping vengeful revenge story that’s got bite and a tight plot (and SF/F).

– I stay clear of contemporary fiction (“literature”) that feature family drama or political drama or just basically drama. The worst would have to be contemporary fiction that wins all the awards but is really about nothing but pretty prose and first world problems. Those are the worst.

9. If you could require the president to read one book, what would it be?
Oh wow, where to begin. I seem to have a theme going here, so I’m gonna say anything by Octavia Butler. Any one of her books would do because they’re all relevant and necessary, and I would love it if someone in the position of president reads her work. Not for show or to gain polling points or “to appeal to a diverse demographic” or what have you, but really read it.

10. What do you plan to read next?
Might be too ambitious of me to say, but I’d like to finish Jacqueline Carey’s whole Kushiel series. I didn’t think I’d like Kushiel’s Dart, I could barely stand it at first, but I reached a turning point in the story today and now I’m kind of hooked. It went from the Splendors of Versailles to Vikings (that show on the History channel) in a blink of an eye, and I’m hooked. It’s hard to explain… I’m not sure why I’m so into this story. It’s… uncomfortable, extremely so. And so sad. The main character has such a sad, lonely life. What makes it even sadder is her convincing us, the reader, that it’s not all that bad, but it is. She was born into prostitution, raised to be an exemplary prostitute, and to play political intrigue games and be another tool in the court. There’s artistry and beauty to it, so she says, but all I can see is someone who’s stuck in a life she cannot escape and she’s convinced herself it’s what she wants. Yet I want to read on, to follow her story to the end.


Forgot to mention in the last post that this is an ongoing meme circling around twitter, and I was tagged by a few people whose tweets I can’t find anymore because twitter is a mess and looking for specific tweets always gives me a headache. So I’m doing the questions here.


Just recently I had to shelve Eye of the World for the third time. No reason other than a case of “wrong time, wrong book,” which happens to be a recurring theme for me when it comes to traditional high fantasy. Eye of the World was picked by one of my GR book clubs and I had every intention of finishing it by the end of May. And I actually got past all the world building this time around, but then my work load piled up and other books, more interesting and more time consuming, got in the way–specifically The Quantum Thief by Hannu Rajaniemi, which took me longer to get through and unravel than I intended. Then Stories of the Raksura, Vol II arrived in the mail, and all my focus and energy went into not devouring it in one night. And that was it for the rest of May. There was just no chance to finish Eye of the World and I got tired of pretending like I could, so back on the shelf it went.

Best Ending of book or series

In terms of execution, it’s a tie between Cloud Atlas by David Mitchell and House of Leaves by Mark Danielewksi, which is funny because they’re polar opposites. One is order and the other chaos. But they both experiment with different styles and voices to weave several narratives together, and I think the result is the most interesting I’ve ever read. Both endings are astounding and stay true to the structure and nature of the books. Cloud Atlas ends in an orderly fashion, just like how it starts. Everything comes full circle and it’s quite poetic to see all the pieces falling into place. House of Leaves, on the other hand, ends with a feeling. You know that feeling you have as you’re drifting off to sleep and you suddenly find yourself diving head first into an abyss and you jerk awake with your heart and adrenaline pumping full force? House of Leaves left me with that feeling. I’m still not sure what that means though.

But in terms of surprise, I would have to say The Giver by Lois Lowry. The ending is left wide open, and that surprised me most about this book. Since it’s YA, I was expecting most loose ends to be wrapped up in a tidy (albeit rushed) ending, but the book ends abruptly in the middle of a scene, if I remember correctly. I haven’t read the sequels, so I don’t know how Jonas’ life turned out or what became of the baby Gabriel, and I think it’s better that way, not knowing. Because knowing would ruin the jarring impact of the book.

Book that gave you the most FEELZ

Basically everything I’ve read by Octavia Butler. Unexpected feelz are the best and most memorable feelz, and unexpected feelz about ambiguous shapeshifting gender-defying aliens are feelz that stay with you long after you finish reading.

But if I had to pick just one book, it would have to be… A Monster Calls by Patrick Ness. The writing is beautifully devastating. Even though I knew what would happen, I still wasn’t prepared for the ending.

“I wish I had a hundred years,” she said, very quietly. “A hundred years I could give to you.”

Gets me every time.


Currently reading:


Magic Rises (Kate Daniels, #6) by Ilona Andrews

With Magic Shifts (#8) coming out later this summer and Magic Breaks (#7) arriving in the mail today, I figured it was time to get reacquainted with Kate Daniels and her chaotic, over-the-top, post-apocalyptic world. It’s a world I love with characters I’m fond of. My only complaint though is the focus of the series shifting away from Kate with the addition of so many new characters. It’s become more like an ensemble cast but with Kate still as the main POV. Another thing is the shift from Kate’s life as a lone-wolf mercenary to her domestic life as Curran’s mate. Just seems odd is all and somewhat difficult for me to adjust to, mostly because I find Kate being on her own much more interesting than her settling down–figure of speech, of course, since nothing settles down in this world.

While I recall books 1 through 5 just fine, I’m having trouble remembering the events of Magic Rises. I tacked it on on the tail end of an energetic UF marathon and I was just short of burning out by the time I finished, so there might have been some breezing through and skimming past key sequences of the plot. The only things coming back to me now is Kate settling into her role as the Pack’s mistress, the Pack’s trip to Europe to help solve the European Pack’s problems, a beloved character dies, and some new ones are added to the ever-expanding Pack family.

Since I recall so little of this book, it’ll be like reading it for the first time.


TBR soon:

something by Tanith Lee (haven’t decided yet)

She passed away recently and a post on bookriot lists 3 books as possible starting points for people who have never read her. And I’m among them but I’ve always been meaning to read her–is what we all say. Don’t know why I kept pushing her books further down my list in favor of other lesser works, but no more. I’m gonna read something by Tanith Lee this summer.

People say she wrote great stories and had a beautiful way with prose.

Though we come and go, and pass into the shadows, where we leave behind us stories told–on paper, on the wings of butterflies, on the wind, on the hearts of others–there we are remembered, there we work magic and great change–passing on the fire like a torch–forever and forever. Till the sky falls, and all things are flawless and need no words at all.

(quote from io9)


Author you’ve read the most

In terms of number of pages, it’s Charles Dickens since I’ve read most of his books and each must be somewhere 700 to 900 pages (MMPB editions).

But in terms of number of works (including short stories, novellas, and sometimes essays), it’s Brandon Sanderson.

Though neither are authors I read anymore these days. I think after surpassing the 10,000-page mark I just got sick and tired of both authors, and it didn’t help that both are/were formulaic writers who have/had a tendency to rehash the same kinds of characters and problems. After a couple of books, starting a new one by either was like reading the previous one over again. The writing got too repetitive and predictable for me.

Best sequel

It’s a tie between Adulthood Rites by Octavia Butler and Dragonfly in Amber by Diana Gabaldon. If I finish both authors’ body of work, Butler would become my most-read author in terms of number of works and Gabaldon in terms of number of pages.

Best cover art

Another tie, this time between Liz Williams’ Detective Inspector Chen series (original hardcover editions) and Martha Wells’ Books of the Raksura series.


Currently reading:

Three great books


The Reapers are the Angels (Reapers #1) by Alden Bell
Somber, eloquent, and quite beautiful. The writing style reminds me of early contemporary American. “Faulkner-esque” is what some reviewers call it. This book definitely rivals The Girl with All the Gifts in execution and could very well be the best post-apocalyptic book I’ve read this year.


Three Parts Dead (Craft Sequence #1) by Max Gladstone
A surprise, a pleasant surprise. I was lured in by the urban-fantasy-ness and blown away by the setting and world building. As a rule, I have low expectations for all urban fantasies, regardless of hype. So I went into this book expecting it to be average at best, but the depth and scope of Gladstone’s world building won me over. Looking forward to continuing this series.


Stories of the Raksura, Volume II by Martha Wells
What else is there left to say about this series that I haven’t said in my last two posts? When an author hits her stride, it shows in the strength of the narrative and the writing is simply wonderful. Wells just gets better and better with every new Raksura installment. I’d prefer a full-length novel because I just love the Three Worlds and every single character in it, but the short stories and novellas are just as great and fulfilling in their own way. The ones in this second volume fill in the gap between the previous books and from past events before Moon’s time, but these are more than just fillers because each story adds something new to the continuous arc and expand on wonders of the Three Worlds.


Lately I’ve been on a roll with my book choices and have come across a bunch of great ones these past few weeks, and I’d like to tell everyone about them, but there hasn’t been enough time to write. When I do have time, writing and reviewing just seem like too much work. And it doesn’t help that I’ve been writing a lot for work. Not fun things like books and new releases, but reports and proposals and answering dumb questions that anyone could find the answers to on google. *internally eye-rolling forever*. So the inclination to sit down and type out a post, no matter how short and to the point, makes me want to take a nap instead, even if it’s a post about books I actually enjoy.

And besides, it’s summer. There’s always something to do and dogs to walk and backyard gatherings to attend, if only for the free booze. Someone I know always wants to break out the grill and torch a few burgers every weekend that it’s not raining, and someone else always wants to have “a few people over” or go out and “try this new place,” and at least one other person always invite me to their kids’ birthdays–like why? I didn’t even know you had kids… but that’s beside the point.

The point is it’s summer and I have a short attention span. My reading list has been great and I want to let everyone know about all these awesome books I’m breezing through, but writing complete reviews isn’t something I can accomplish. So posts from now on will most likely be a mash-up of updates, short reviews, memes, and a few other things.

7 Deadly Sins of Reading


This tag was created by BookishMalayza on YouTube, and I’ve been tagged by JJ on twitter. I’m doing it here because twitter gives me a headache.


1) What is your most expensive book, and what is your most least expensive book?

My most expensive book to date is probably the History of Botanical Science set. It came with the original text and a beautifully illustrated updated edition. My least expensive books are those I rescued from library and yard sales. They ranged from a penny to a quarter, and they’re all older, out of print SF/F hardback editions.

2) Which author do you have a love/hate relationship with?

Neil Gaiman. Love his writing, don’t like his stories. Does that even make sense? I like his way with words, but I don’t particularly like how his stories turn out. They always seem to stop short of a full ending, which I have no problem with if the books were part of a series, but they’re not, so that’s a bit unnerving. Before Gaiman came along, this spot used to belong to Stephen King but for the exact opposite reason–love his stories, hate the way his writing drags on.

3) What book have you deliciously devoured over and over again, with no remorse whatsoever?

I rarely reread books, not even ones I love, because of time constraints. But I do revisit books I didn’t like the first time around, just to give them a fair chance. None has wowed me yet though. If anything, I end up taking away a star following the reread. The only books I remember reading more than twice are Wild Seed, Outlander, and The Hunger Games.

4) What book have you neglected reading due to laziness?

I don’t neglect books out of laziness but rather a desire to avoid whatever unpleasant subject matter those books contain. Needless to say they’re all nonfictions jam packed with unpleasant politics. Most times my desire to learn win out, but sometimes I have to work myself up to do some prelim research before I start reading.

5) What book do you most talk about in order to sound like a very intellectual reader?

I…don’t do that, at least I don’t think so. I mean, if sounding “intellectual” was important to me, I’d do what everyone is doing, and that’s bringing up Bret Ellis Easton and Donna Tartt in almost every breath. Or I’d casually drop a reference or two about Infinite Jest that only those who’ve actually read it would understand. But I don’t do it because I’m not an intellectual (read: asshole). 😉

6) What attributes do you find most attractive in male or female characters?

I don’t…know? I don’t find characters attractive. I mean, I understand when other people say they’re attracted to certain characters or call them their ideal mates or whatever, but that doesn’t happen with me. I “gauge” characters by how believable they are to me, how believable their thoughts and actions are to me, and whether or not I’d like them if they were real people. Does that make sense? Whether I’m attracted to certain characters doesn’t apply into the equation, which is why I have no problem reading about unpleasant or deplorable characters.

7) What books would you most like to receive as a gift?

One sure way to get me to read a book is to gift wrap it. Usually I have no preference and welcome any book as a gift because, like people say, it’s the thoughts that count. I’m more interested in what the book means to the gift giver and why they want me to read it, than I am in the book itself. But currently I have one book-thing in mind: the hardback editions of Chris Wooding’s Tales of the Ketty Jay, preferably the editions with the original cover art. If anyone has been able to find the complete series and send it to me, I’d appreciate it greatly (and love you forever!).

As you might have noticed, I’m very particular about book editions and cover art, but that’s only when it comes to books I buy for myself. I don’t expect anyone to understand my–sometimes ridiculously specific–book specifications. I appreciate all gift books in whatever shape and form they come in because it’s the thoughts that count.


I’m tagging everyone who wants to do this, and I look forward to your answers!

Some thoughts RE: So You’ve Been Publicly Shamed

The ever-hilarious Jon Ronson is back with another investigation into pop-psychology, or rather the collective psyche of that mob mentality on social media. Some call it a social movement. I have no idea what it really is, but I’m fascinated by its energy. Here is a snippet from Ronson’s meeting with Jonah Lehrer, the now infamous self-plagiarist.

For the last hour Jonah had been repeatedly telling me, in a voice strained to breaking point, ‘I don’t belong in your book.’

And I was repeatedly replying, ‘Yes, you do.’

I didn’t understand what he was talking about. I was writing a book about public shaming. He had been publicly shamed. He was ideal.

Now he suddenly stopped, mid hiking trail, and looked intently at me. ‘I am a terrible story to put in your book,’ he said.

‘Why?’ I said.

‘What’s that William Dean Howells line?’ he said. ‘“Americans like a tragedy with a happy ending”?’

The actual William Dean Howells line is ‘What the American public wants in the theatre is a tragedy with a happy ending.’ I think Jonah was close enough.

Hah, way to kick him when he’s down.

Aside from self-plagiarizing, Jonah Lehrer has also been found guilty of misquotations and, in some cases, mangling Bob Dylan’s words. That was his downfall–mangling Bob Dylan. It was a small, barely noticeable, lapse in Lehrer’s huge body of work. By the time anyone (Michael Moynihan) found that tiny piece of loose thread and pulled, Lehrer had already become a popular successful author. And he’s so young too. Everyone had been amazed. So when the boy genius fell from grace, it was a big deal. It rocked the publishing world. But the fall out didn’t stop there. People went back and meticulously combed through everything he’s written and found that almost every essay and two books, now pulled from publication, contained self-plagiarism.

You may not think that’s a big deal–so he didn’t cite himself a couple of times, so what? Here’s what: he did it repeatedly and, I would assume, deliberately. But you’ll have to read Moynihan’s side of the story and decide for yourself. Anyhow. The point isn’t that Leher “forgot” to cite himself. The point is he recycled old material and passed it off as new…and got paid handsomely for it. If Lehrer were to cite himself properly in each of his essays, almost every single paragraph would have been a quotation taken from essays he’d written in the past. Very little of the new essay would contain new or original content. So if not for the recycled material, there would have been no new material to publish or sell. It was essentially a scam, and Lehrer did it knowingly. That is the point. Another point is no one looked twice because he’s a young educated fellow from a prestigious background, but that’s another thing entirely.

So far I haven’t learned much about the concept of public shaming, other than how it plays out, but I did learn what self-plagiarism is in the publishing world. And yes, it’s a difficult thing to avoid when you’ve written so much for so long on just one topic. Sometimes you’ll end up repeating what you’ve already written in the past; the lapse in memory is bound to happen sooner or later. It’s an honest mistake… if it happens once or twice. But in almost every essay? That shows intent and deliberation.

Jon Ronson writes in a very funny and engaging way. I find myself reluctant to put this book down.


[ETA] I did some digging and it looks like Jonah Lehrer’s transgressions extended further than self-plagiarism. People have found actual plagiarism in the two books that were pulled and many of his essays from Wired.com and The New Yorker. Only 18 essays were pulled for closer examination, and of those 18, 17 were found to contain plagiarized material. People have also found instances where Lehrer pulled a Stephen Glass, formerly known as a Janet Cooke, and made up facts and sources to pad his writing (source).

Jon Ronson seems to think we’re all being too hard on Lehrer. Maybe it’s time to forgive and forget? Maybe. After all, “we’re not monsters.” Hah hah…hah. Ahem. We’ll just have to see how much plagiarism is in his new book to determine whether or not it’s forgivable. Oh btw, he’s sold a new manuscript (source).

Some thoughts RE: Bill Browder and Red Notice

This book came to me highly recommended by people I work with. It’s not the type of book I normally read, but every once in a while I pick up a nonfiction exposition to, you know, keep up with current events.

The premise is an American businessman, Bill Browder, in the early 1990s saw an opportunity in Russia and went for it. After setting up shop and working with the Kremlin for some time, he found himself in over his head when his work was pulled out from under him, and then he got kicked out of the country and charged with a list of crimes against the government for trying to expose corruption. It’s a whirlwind of a story, full of intrigue, suspense, corruption, and murder.

It’s an interesting story and well written overall, but what I’ve been able to skim from the book so far leads me to believe that Browder’s troubles could have been avoided had he done his homework ahead of time.

Continue reading